Week 3 Assignment Question 1

Week 3 Assignment Question 1

Week3 Assignment


Thereare many factors that make the individual aspire to become localunion, officers. First, there are some aspects inherent in humanbeings, one of it being the desire for recognition, particularly whenlower needs have been met. Therefore, many become local unionofficers for prestige and status in the community. Some people have astrong a believe that unions are paramount organizations withimportant roles in the society (Sloane &amp Witney, 2010). Koziara,Brandley, and Pierson indicates that individual who believe thatunions are important in the community, regard the position of a localunion officer as a chance to make the movement achieve its goals byserving in a sincere and effective way.

Somepeople are also attracted by the competitive features connected tothe position of a local union officer. The fact that local unionofficers deal with matters relating to union members on a daily basismakes such a job not only resemble work in a company, but it alsoentails hectic events like those in business management (Sloane &ampWitney, 2010). Political factors also drive some people to seek forthe position of a local union officer. In this light, such a positionis regarded as the first step in rising to the highest rank in thehierarchy of union leadership. The top prize is the presidency andbecoming a local union officer is a step in the right directiontowards becoming a national union officer and president. Ultimatelyleaders holding such position have a higher remuneration and betterterms of service (Sloane &amp Witney, 2010).


Theconstitution of the national union is imperative as it lays down theguiding codes and rules of the organization, as delineated by thenational organization. The Constitution provides the framework forlocal and regional union activities so that the operations of theunion can run smoothly, and in harmony. It is this document thatdirects and steers the local organization so that their perform theirfunctions accordingly (Sloane &amp Witney, 2010). The constitutionfor a national union reduces internal strife by delineating therights of all members and describing how various operations will berun. This document also gives the organization a sense of vision andfundamental rationale. It gives answers to questions that mightotherwise spark heated arguments and debates. It also outlines theinternal procedures and governments of the organization by puttingthe policies of the union in writing (Sloane &amp Witney, 2010).

Theconstitution is also an important document because it outlines thestandards with which all union members must comply (Sloane &ampWitney, 2010). By setting the standards and the penalty fornoncompliance, the constitution ensures stability and consistency inthe union. Finally by defining powers and duties of members andofficers and put into writing the appeal procedures and votingprocesses, it enables the union to not only grow but also develop.


Oneof the key duties of the president and the executive board is toenforce the constitution of the union. They also make and execute thepolicies they make. The president and the board have a duty of makingsure that if any of the national officer positions falls vacant thereare people to fill them (Sloane &amp Witney, 2010). Members of theexecutive board have a direct supervision on the locals.

Unmistakablythe remuneration of the national union presidents and executiveboards is incomparable. Even though they work for the same number ofhours, and sometimes more than their counterparts in the corporationsin the United States, they receive significantly small compensation(Sloane &amp Witney, 2010). For example, the highest paid presidentof laborers received an annual salary of $421,974, while the averagepay for 33 presidents of the largest organization in the UnitedStates was $400,000-$300000 (Sloane &amp Witney, 2010). On the otherhand, the median pay for 350 of chief executive officers in 350corporations was $6548805.Most notably, the highest paid CEO,received a total of 54.8million in 2006, which is way above the$421974 that the highest paid president received for the sameduration (Sloane &amp Witney, 2010). Also, some of the CEO receivedhuge sums of money despite the fact that their organization had notperformed well. Therefore, it is such differences in compensationthat make some people regard remuneration towards president andexecutives to the board as unfair.


Thenational union constitution outlines the standards with which allunion members must comply, elements that are also duplicated in thelocal union bylaws. Members who breach the set standards aredisciplined in many forms such as fine, reprimand, suspension and ingross misconduct expulsion from the union (Sloane &amp Witney,2010). Some of the types of breaches include activities that supportor promote dual unionship. This means that a union member endeavorsto take out a local from a union and to place them to another.Second, circulating false information, and malicious reports aboutthe union officers. This also encompasses sending the unionmembership list to unauthorized individuals, embezzlement andmisappropriation of union funds, participating in illegal strikes,strikebreaking, providing confidential and secret information to theemployer and refusing to the picker. Members are also considered tohave breached standards if they join a totalitarian group such asfascists and communists (Sloane &amp Witney, 2010). Even though theprocedures followed to enforce rules at the local union level differwidely, many local unions use the following procedure. An aggrievedparty or a member initiates the process by filing a charge againstanother member or leader (Sloane &amp Witney, 2010). The presidentappoints a trial committee, which is mainly made of members from thelocal in the trial. The trial committee conducts a thoroughinvestigation cross examines the evidence provided by the accuser.The committee holds a hearing where the accused member is present.Individual accused are allowed to get the services of an attorney andmay even use another union member to present their side of the story(Sloane &amp Witney, 2010).

Thetrail committee reports to its verdict to the local union membership,which may either, opt to act or reject the verdict. They have powersalso to modify the decisions. Members who file charges can appeal tothe executive boards of the national union if the verdict of notguilty is adopted. In the same vein, the accused can also appeal if aguilty verdict is adopted. An accused can also engage a federal courtif the decision of the national union is regarded unfair or biased(Sloane &amp Witney, 2010).


Sloane,A. A., &amp Witney, F. (2010). Laborrelations(13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall